On January 4, 2022, amendments to Health Canada's Special Access Program took effect that explicitly include access to psychedelic medicine. We asked Numinus'... Health Canada’s New SAP Rules: A Q&A With Numinus’ Payton Nyquvest

In 2020, Health Canada began tentative steps to open up legal access to psychedelics-based therapies via “exemptions” granted through its Special Access Program (SAP).

Recently, Health Canada announced it was increasing access to the SAP, specifically with respect to psychedelics-based therapies. The new rules took effect on January 4, 2022, and are an important step along the road to broader legal access to psychedelic medicine in Canada.

However, some ambiguities in the language make the immediate impact of these amendments unclear. Psychedelic Stock Watch decided to go straight to an expert for further insights: Payton Nyquvest, Founder and CEO for Numinus Wellness (CAN:NUMI / US:NUMIF).

Numinus is one of the leading providers of psychedelics-based mental health treatment in Canada via its growing network of clinics. The company is also a clinic host for MAPS in its Phase III clinical trial for PTSD and is involved in its own proprietary psychedelic drug research.

Payton Nyquvest has a deep background in drug policy and advocacy as well as research into innovative therapies. This gives Numinus’ Founder and CEO a very informed perspective on Health Canada’s SAP rules.

We caught up with Payton and asked him to share his thoughts on this exciting development for psychedelics-based therapies in Canada.

1)  For readers who are new to SAP, could you summarize how Health Canada’s Special Access Program worked with respect to psychedelics-based therapies before January 4th?
 

PN: Due to the previous stigma towards psychedelic medicines, these drugs could not be approved via the Health Canada Special Access Programme which is the mechanism that allows for patient access to investigational or currently unapproved treatments when other treatments have been ineffective. So, in effect, there was not a mechanism for patients in need to access psychedelic medicines.  This was not ethical, and Health Canada knew this. It was an old decision based on dated sentiment, not evidence and the current government should be congratulated on making this change.

We know that many available mental health treatments do not benefit enough patients and untoward side effects are common.  The SAP amendment will now allow physicians to request patient access to psychedelic treatments, such as MDMA- and psilocybin-assisted therapy, for serious conditions on a case-by-case basis when other treatments have been ineffective. This change has the potential to positively affect the lives of people experiencing serious mental health conditions when available therapies have failed, are unsuitable or are unavailable in Canada. A large and growing body of research has demonstrated the benefit of psychedelic-assisted therapy in treating many conditions and through the recently announced changes to Health Canada’s SAP, we hope more people will have access to therapies not yet approved in Canada.

2)  How do the new rules modify access for these Health Canada “exemptions”?
 

PN: Consistent with the Notice of Intent that was published in Canada Gazette, Part I, regulatory amendments were made on December 17, 2021, to restore the possibility for practitioners who are allowed to prescribe drugs to request access to restricted drugs through Health Canada’s Special Access Program (SAP). Prior to this, psychedelic medicines could not be requested via SAP and there was no other mechanism to facilitate patient access in a legal and timely way.

Practitioners can, on behalf of patients with serious or life-threatening conditions, can now request access to psychedelic medicines through the SAP when other therapies have failed, are unsuitable, or are unavailable in Canada and when there is sufficient data to support the safety and efficacy of the drug for the specific condition of the patient.

The SAP does not have a wait list, as it is meant for emergency access. Practitioners can, on behalf of patients with serious or life-threatening conditions, request access to restricted drugs through the SAP when other therapies have failed, are unsuitable, or are unavailable in Canada and when there is sufficient data to support the safety and efficacy of the drug for the specific condition of the patient.  The timeline for a response from the SAP program is 1-2 days.

Patients cannot apply to the SAP directly, and only licensed healthcare practitioners who are authorized under the laws of a province or territory to treat patients with a prescription drug may file requests through the SAP.

3)  On the one hand, Health Canada is explicitly opening up the SAP to both new psychedelic drugs and new qualifying medical conditions. On the other hand, it has explicitly stated that these new rules are not intended as any sort of back-door to the legalization of psychedelic medicine. How do you see Health Canada actually implementing this balancing act in increasing access to psychedelics-based therapies in Canada?
 

PN: The evidence to support LSD, psilocybin and MDMA assisted psychotherapy goes back decades and studies show that these treatments can be very safe.  For instance, a study comparing MDMA-assisted psychotherapy to the use of antidepressants for PTSD demonstrated MDMA was safer.  We similarly know that when offered in a safe environment by trained staff, psilocybin and LSD are also very safe.  Health regulators want to see medications approved through research.  Psychedelics are unique since LSD, MDMA and psilocybin were once widely used in clinical contexts prior to being made illegal.  For instance, MDMA is believed to have been used in over 150,000 therapy sessions prior to being made illegal.  LSD was once widely used in the treatment of alcohol use disorder. So, psychedelics were uniquely precluded for use through the SAP and, similarly, are uniquely different than traditional pharmaceutical drugs since they have been around for a long time.

The SAP is also not perfectly fit for certain psychedelics. For example, in the case of Psilocybin, it is a naturally occurring substance that is more akin to a traditional medicine than a pharmaceutical drug, so a traditional pharma type approach is not entirely appropriate. Here, given what we know about Psilocybin and its longstanding safety record in both traditional/sacred medicine contexts as well as recreational use, further progress should focus on a medical access regime that is less cumbersome and more fit for purpose than the Special Access Program.  

What we do know is this is a crucial step that recognizes the research and benefits of psychedelic-assisted therapy. And while full regulated medical access may not be part of this announcement, with no limit to SAP requests, we hope this can start to provide lasting change for the many people in Canada in need.  

4)  Given that Health Canada does not want SAP to be a back-door to legalization, do you see a risk to the industry if Health Canada receives a flood of psychedelics-based applications, then feels compelled to refuse most of them in order to not appear to be “opening the flood-gates”?
 

PN: Health Canada should be congratulated for making this change. What it means is that they are acknowledging that psychedelics can be used as medicine and validates the rigorous studies that have shown that certain psychedelics can be very safe and useful when used clinically for the treatment of certain mental disorders.

The SAP program really leaves patient safety with the physician or prescriber requesting the medication and if a patient has a serious medical illness without other treatment options, we feel Health Canada has an ethical obligation to allow for patient access. We expect Health Canada agrees. This change to the SAP was made specifically for this reason.  Legalization is another matter.

5)  What do you see as the near-term impact of these amendments for Numinus and other providers of psychedelics-based mental health therapies in Canada?
 

PN: Numinus will be working closely with Health Canada to understand the regulatory change and, where appropriate, support appropriate SAP requests. We are currently operating clinics with appropriately established psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy infrastructure and trained therapists and physicians to support patients with special access requests. We are closely following updates from Health Canada on the SAP amendment and will follow their guidance and regulations consistent with the updated SAP Guidance document. We are well positioned to support our affiliated physicians and clients with SAP requests.

6)  Looking at the Big Picture, how do you think these amendments will impact the psychedelic drug industry as a whole?
 

PN: Canada has the potential to be a world leader as this program has the ability to allow organizations to get tremendous experience with certain psychedelics for patients with serious health conditions where other treatments have not been successful. There will be some great experience developed in Canada and, hopefully, new opportunities for people who are struggling.

7)  Obviously, SAP is not intended to be any sort of long-term solution in terms of providing access to badly-needed psychedelics-based therapies for Canadians. How long do you think it will be until we see more concrete movement from the federal government in providing broader legal access to psychedelic medicine?
 

PN: While we ultimately expect to see psychedelics fully researched and understood so that they can be part of the mainstream mental wellness system, the SAP announcement is a huge stride that does provide a vehicle for persons in Canada that would otherwise not have access.  This is a very concrete step in the right direction, and we expect increased evidence and interest going forward.

8)  Given the broad support among Canadians for the legalization of psilocybin-based medicine (~80%), do you see psilocybin as the first drug that will be opened up for broader access in Canada?
 

PN: MDMA is farthest along in the traditional drug development process with a Phase 3 trial completed by MAPS and a second Phase 3 trial well underway.

Psilocybin is different in that it is a naturally occurring substances that has been used for hundreds of years in a traditional/sacred medicine context.  We believe there should be an access mechanism that is not the traditional drug development model though observably there are groups pursuing approvals for synthetic psilocybin.

It will be interesting to see how the drug approval process for MDMA unfolds with, hopefully, psilocybin leading the way or close behind once health policy makers are full versed current evidence and safety data.

9)  Where do you see the state of psychedelic medicine in Canada 5 years from today?
 

PN: We expect that MDMA, and psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy will be part of the mainstream mental wellness system. Other psychedelics may also have come online by that time.  The evidence around effectiveness and safety are growing continuously.

DISCLOSURE: The writer holds shares in Numinus Wellness.

 

MJ Shareholders avatar

MJ Shareholders

MJShareholders.com is the largest dedicated financial network and leading corporate communications firm serving the legal cannabis industry. Our network aims to connect public marijuana companies with these focused cannabis audiences across the US and Canada that are critical for growth: Short and long term cannabis investors Active funding sources Mainstream media Business leaders Cannabis consumers




( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )