Disclaimer: Matters discussed on this website contain forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. CFN Media Group, which owns CannabisFN, is not registered with any financial or securities regulatory authority and does not provide nor claims to provide investment advice or recommendations to readers of this release. CFN Media Group, which owns CannabisFN, may from time-to-time have a position in the securities mentioned herein and will increase or decrease such positions without notice. The Information contains forward-looking statements, i.e. statements or discussions that constitute predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, estimates, or projections as indicated by such words as “expects”, “will”, “anticipates”, and “estimates”; therefore, you should proceed with extreme caution in relying upon such statements and conduct a full investigation of the Information and the Profiled Issuer as well as any such forward-looking statements. Any forward looking statements we make in the Information are limited to the time period in which they are made, and we do not undertake to update forward looking statements that may change at any time; The Information is presented only as a brief “snapshot” of the Profiled Issuer and should only be used, at most, and if at all, as a starting point for you to conduct a thorough investigation of the Profiled Issuer and its securities and to consult your financial, legal or other adviser(s) and avail yourself of the filings and information that may be accessed at www.sec.gov, www.pinksheets.com, www.otcmarkets.com or other electronic sources, including: (a) reviewing SEC periodic reports (Forms 10-Q and 10-K), reports of material events (Form 8-K), insider reports (Forms 3, 4, 5 and Schedule 13D); (b) reviewing Information and Disclosure Statements and unaudited financial reports filed with the Pink Sheets or www.otcmarkets.com; (c) obtaining and reviewing publicly available information contained in commonlyknown search engines such as Google; and (d) consulting investment guides at www.sec.gov and www.finra.com. You should always be cognizant that the Profiled Issuers may not be current in their reporting obligations with the SEC and OTCMarkets and/or have negative signs at www.otcmarkets.com (See section below titled “Risks Related to the Profiled Issuers, which provides additional information pertaining thereto). For making specific investment decisions, readers should seek their own advice and that of their own professional advisers. CFN Media Group, which owns CannabisFN, may be compensated for its Services in the form of cash-based and/or equity-based compensation in the companies it writes about, or a combination of the two. For full disclosure, please visit: https://www.cannabisfn.com/legal-disclaimer/. A short time after we acquire the securities of the foregoing company, we may publish the (favorable) information about the issuer referenced above advising others, including you, to purchase; and while doing so, we may sell the securities we acquired. In addition, a third-party shareholder compensating us may sell his or her shares of the issuer while we are publishing favorable information about the issuer. Except for the historical information presented herein, matters discussed in this article contain forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. CFN Media Group, which owns CannabisFN, is not registered with any financial or securities regulatory authority, and does not provide nor claims to provide investment advice or recommendations to readers of this release. CFN Media Group, which owns CannabisFN, may from time to time have a position in the securities mentioned herein and will increase or decrease such positions without notice. For making specific investment decisions, readers should seek their own advice and that of their own professional advisers. CFN Media Group, which owns CannabisFN, may be compensated for its Services in the form of cash-based and/or equity- based compensation in the companies it writes about, or a combination of the two. For full disclosure please visit: https://www.cannabisfn.com/legal-disclaimer/.

Copyright © Accelerize Inc. · All Rights Reserved · Privacy Policy · Legal Disclaimer

October 19, 2021 at 3:30 p.m.

A recent survey from the Center for the Study of Cannabis and Social Policy and Cooperation Humboldt found that the vast majority of local cannabis cultivators want more cooperative support, yet there are almost no cannabis cooperatives on the North Coast.

The survey “Corporate Cannabis is Coming: Cultivators, Are You Ready?” sought to identify what services cannabis farmers are lacking locally. Of the 82 survey respondents, 85.6% said they would like assistance in developing cooperative systems, according to Nicole Riggs, affiliate researcher for the Center for the Study of Cannabis and Social Policy.

“Our hypothesis is that the problem is due in part to regulatory roadblocks, and in part because farmers are yet to define what an ideal cooperative would look like,” she said. “In the next phase, we’ll be exploring just that. We’re interviewing many farmers to understand what their needs, their hopes are for co-ops, and simultaneously, we’re seeking advice from legal experts in cannabis to get clarity on how a particular rule will impact co-ops.”

Drew Barber, owner-operator of East Mill Creek Farms in the Mattole Valley, helped start Uplift Cooperative in 2018 – the only cannabis cooperative in Humboldt County.

“Uplift Cooperative is a cannabis producers cooperative that was founded by myself and some of my neighbors in the lower Mattole Valley between Honeydew and Petrolia,” he said. “We’re using a bunch of different tactics and strategies to do that and we’re really just trying to reduce the cost of production and increase costs of value at sales. A lot of it has to do with the complexities of regulations.”

In essence, they’re looking to connect small cannabis farmers to increase their viability in the marketplace.

“The small producer doesn’t necessarily have all the skills needed to produce their product, get their product to market at the value that they need and do all of the various compliance pieces,” Barber said. “So we’re trying to ease some of those burdens and basically work together where we can to gain those benefits. Other businesses that we’re competing against — like these larger-scale operations — have plenty of funding, plenty of staff and personnel but most small farms don’t really have staff and personnel. I get these calls, ‘Hey, can we talk to your compliance officer?’ and I’m like, ‘Well, you’re talking to him! You’re also talking to the owner and the grower.’ ”

Barber said the Uplift Cooperative is also looking to market their product together.

“That involves having a cooperative brand that all the farmers own that we can put out in the world and really share the burden of the entire marketing process from finding the right distributor, putting the product in the right bag or jar, getting it to the right shelf space at the retail shops, and then communicating with the community of people who frequent those shops as well as the budtenders who work at those shops,” he said. “Those are a lot of steps for each individual farm to handle.”

As cannabis producers struggle to make ends meet as the market tanks, Barber said it is crucial for the county and the state to offer more support to cultivators.

The Center for the Study of Cannabis and Social Policy and Cooperation Humboldt’s ultimate goal is twofold, Riggs said.

“First, we want to arm farmers with solid research and realistic options to establish formal or informal cooperatives or to go to trade associations to lobby for improved policy based on their needs,” she said. “Second, to document the process of putting at the center of decision-making the very people that will be impacted by decisions, in this case, cannabis farmers on the North Coast. This is design thinking for social innovation, an approach to problem-solving that’s particularly suited to complex situations.”

Barber believes cannabis cooperatives would serve as a significant stabilizer in the marketplace for farmers.

“Both in terms of how the entity works in that all the profit belongs to the member-owners, but it can be returned in a variety of different ways,” he said. “Some farms have big years and then small years, just based on the nature of agriculture. You might have a farm that’s not making much money this year but they’re making a lot of money next year, so they end up having these highly cycling tax burdens. If the co-op steps in and are helping to bring in the capital to the farms by holding the brand and by running sales, they’re able to mellow out those spikes and drops in income for the member farm.”

Barber noted that the process “is a little wonky” but said cooperatives are a great tool in keeping capital local and keeping quality high. Famers just need a little bit of incentive to initiate the process.

Isabella Vanderheiden | Reporter

Isabella Vanderheiden covers Humboldt County government, environment and cannabis news for the Times-Standard. Isabella earned a bachelor’s degree in Journalism from Humboldt State University and has written for several Humboldt County news outlets.

Source: Associated Press

A federal judge has ruled Northern California county officials can’t stop trucks from delivering water to Hmong farmers who are illegally growing marijuana, saying the practice raises “serious questions” about racial discrimination and leaves the growers without a source of water for drinking, bathing and growing food.

Chief U.S. District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller last week issued a temporary injunction against Siskiyou County’s prohibition on trucked-in water deliveries to Hmong farmers who run illegal operations in the Mount Shasta Vista subdivision in the Big Springs area about 300 miles (480 kilometers) north of San Francisco.

“Without an injunction, the plaintiffs and other members of the Shasta Vista Hmong community will likely go without water for their basic needs and will likely lose more plants and livestock,” she wrote in the ruling issued last Friday.

“The plaintiffs have also raised serious questions about their constitutional right to be free from racial discrimination,” she added.

Mueller’s injunction, which was reported by the Sacramento Bee, takes effect immediately and will remain in place until the conclusion of a federal lawsuit filed by the Hmong community against county ordinances aimed at cutting off the water supply to illegal marijuana grows. They allege the ordinances were racially motivated and violated their civil rights. No trial date has been scheduled.

Authorities estimate there are 5,000 to 6,000 greenhouses growing pot in the Big Springs area, with as many as 4,000 to 8,000 people tending them, most of them Hmong and immigrants of Chinese descent who have moved to the area in the last five years.

Recreational marijuana became legal in California in 2018, but the illegal marketplace continues to thrive. Growing, processing or selling pot requires a license and the businesses must pay taxes — costs that illegal operations don’t have. Legal businesses say they are being undercut and have urged authorities to crack down.

In Siskiyou County, officials this spring approved ordinances that prohibit selling well water without a permit and ban water trucks on the roads leading to the subdivision after residents complained the expansion of the greenhouses was causing local wells to go dry and because of a rise in violent crime.

The permit forms are all written in English, despite a language barrier for some residents, and the county requires anyone who signs an application to swear not to violate any county rules, which Mueller notes includes not having a proper water supply at their homes.

The judge left in place a county ordinance that prohibits selling well water specifically for illegal cannabis cultivation. The injunction only covers water sales and deliveries for residents’ needs such as bathing and gardening, said Allison Margolin, one of the attorneys for the Hmong.

Siskiyou County’s attorney, Edward Kiernan, didn’t immediately return a request for comment. In previous interviews, Siskiyou County officials denied their motivations were driven by race.